Compare Lunr with the systems asset owners already run.
Where the drawing record lives is a decision an asset owner keeps for the life of the asset, long after any one project closes. Most of the systems below were built for a project team, a design office, or the wider organisation, and each does that job well. These comparisons set out, tool by tool, where each one fits and where a record built for engineering drawings does something different.
For asset owners · project delivery through operation · what each system is built for
Twelve systems, and where each one fits.
Start with the system you run today. Each comparison is written the same way: what the tool is good at, the specific points where a drawing set needs more, and how the two sit side by side.
- Document library · Microsoft 36501
SharePoint
Strong on Office documents and intranets. Read where a drawing set needs revision control a document library was never built to give.
Read the comparison - Enterprise content · OpenText02
OpenText
Enterprise content management for the whole business. Read where engineering drawings need purpose-built control and search.
Read the comparison - Metadata-driven DMS · M-Files03
M-Files
One governed document platform for the whole business, organised by metadata. Read where drawing numbers, revisions, and scanned sheets need first-class handling.
Read the comparison - Project CDE · Oracle04
Aconex
A project-delivery collaboration platform. Read where the record has to outlast the project and stay with the owner.
Read the comparison - Project collaboration · InEight Document05
TeamBinder
TeamBinder, now sold as InEight Document, runs delivery-side document control across the project team. Read where the owner needs a register that outlives the project archive.
Read the comparison - Construction management · Procore06
Procore
A construction management platform built around the contractor. Read where the owner keeps the controlled drawing record.
Read the comparison - Construction cloud · Autodesk07
Autodesk Docs
The common data environment inside Autodesk Construction Cloud. Read where the record has to hold every format, not one toolset's.
Read the comparison - Design collaboration · Bentley08
ProjectWise
A design-team work-sharing environment. Read where the owner needs an operating record rather than a project workspace.
Read the comparison - CAD data management · Autodesk09
Autodesk Vault
Check-in, check-out, and dependency tracking at the design desk. Read where the record has to reach operations staff who only need to open a sheet.
Read the comparison - On-premise EDMS · Synergis10
Synergis Adept
An on-premise platform with deep CAD integrations. Read where an owner wants the record in the browser rather than a server room.
Read the comparison - AEC data management · 12d Solutions11
12d Synergy
Worksharing and managed datasets for civil design offices. Read where an owner wants the finished set in a browser rather than a Windows client and a SQL Server.
Read the comparison - Cloud EDMS · Accruent12
RedEye
Cloud engineering document management for asset owners, strong in the field, now sold by Accruent alongside Meridian. Read where two products built for the same reader actually differ.
Read the comparison
For the whole field in one place, including Accruent Meridian and the six criteria to put to each vendor, read the survey of engineering document management software.
Running a system that is not listed here? Book a walkthrough and we will map Lunr against the tools your estate already relies on.
Four kinds of system, one of them yours.
The twelve above divide into four kinds of system, each built for a different reader, and which kind you are replacing decides how much of the record moves with you. Find the group you already run, then read that comparison first.
Document platforms for the whole organisation
SharePoint, OpenText, and M-Files hold every class of document a business produces, from policies and contracts to engineering. Each comparison looks at what a drawing set asks for on top: drawing numbers, revision conventions, and CAD formats that open without a licence.
Platforms that run project delivery
Aconex, TeamBinder, Procore, and Autodesk Docs coordinate the organisations building the asset, carrying correspondence, transmittals, submittals, and the models the delivery team works from. Each one is scoped to a project that eventually closes.
Environments built for the design office
ProjectWise, Autodesk Vault, Synergis Adept, and 12d Synergy manage work in progress at the desk where drawings are made, with integrations inside the CAD applications and the file relationships that hold a drawing set together. What the owner receives is what comes out the far end.
Built for the owner's engineering record
RedEye is the closest like-for-like comparison on this hub, cloud engineering document management for an asset owner rather than for a project team or a design office.
Most owners keep more than one. The usual shape is the project platform running delivery, the design office on its own environment, and one controlled register that takes the set at handover and holds it for the decades after. For what that register does, read engineering document management, or the handover validation that checks a close-out package as it lands.
See where Lunr fits against what you run.
Book a walkthrough with someone who knows what a transmittal and an as-constructed drawing are, and watch Lunr run against a set of your own.
10M+ documents under management · Hosted in Australia and the US · SAML · Full audit trail · Export anytime
- entity
- Lunr Labs Pty Ltd
- location
- Melbourne AU
- workspace
- documents.lunr.app
- rev
- 2026