Compare Lunr with the systems asset owners already run.
Where the drawing record lives is a decision an asset owner keeps for the life of the asset, long after any one project closes. Most of the systems below were built for a project team, a design office, or the wider organisation, and each does that job well. These comparisons set out, tool by tool, where each one fits and where a record built for engineering drawings does something different.
For asset owners · project delivery through operation · what each system is built for
Twelve systems, and where each one fits.
Start with the system you run today. Each comparison is written the same way: what the tool is good at, the specific points where a drawing set needs more, and how the two sit side by side.
- Document library · Microsoft 36501
SharePoint
Strong on Office documents and intranets. Read where a drawing set needs revision control a document library was never built to give.
Read the comparison - Project CDE · Oracle02
Aconex
A project-delivery collaboration platform. Read where the record has to outlast the project and stay with the owner.
Read the comparison - Design collaboration · Bentley03
ProjectWise
A design-team work-sharing environment. Read where the owner needs an operating record rather than a project workspace.
Read the comparison - Construction cloud · Autodesk04
Autodesk Docs
The common data environment inside Autodesk Construction Cloud. Read where the record has to hold every format, not one toolset's.
Read the comparison - Construction management · Procore05
Procore
A construction management platform built around the contractor. Read where the owner keeps the controlled drawing record.
Read the comparison - Enterprise content · OpenText06
OpenText
Enterprise content management for the whole business. Read where engineering drawings need purpose-built control and search.
Read the comparison - On-premise EDMS · Synergis07
Synergis Adept
An on-premise platform with deep CAD integrations. Read where an owner wants the record in the browser rather than a server room.
Read the comparison - Project collaboration · InEight Document08
TeamBinder
TeamBinder, now sold as InEight Document, runs delivery-side document control across the project team. Read where the owner needs a register that outlives the project archive.
Read the comparison - AEC data management · 12d Solutions09
12d Synergy
Worksharing and managed datasets for civil design offices. Read where an owner wants the finished set in a browser rather than a Windows client and a SQL Server.
Read the comparison - CAD data management · Autodesk10
Autodesk Vault
Check-in, check-out, and dependency tracking at the design desk. Read where the record has to reach operations staff who only need to open a sheet.
Read the comparison - Metadata-driven DMS · M-Files11
M-Files
One governed document platform for the whole business, organised by metadata. Read where drawing numbers, revisions, and scanned sheets need first-class handling.
Read the comparison - Cloud EDMS · Accruent12
RedEye
Cloud engineering document management for asset owners, strong in the field, now sold by Accruent alongside Meridian. Read where two products built for the same reader actually differ.
Read the comparison
For the whole field in one place, including Accruent Meridian and the six criteria to put to each vendor, read the survey of engineering document management software.
Running a system that is not listed here? Book a walkthrough and we will map Lunr against the tools your estate already relies on.
See where Lunr fits against what you run.
Book a walkthrough with someone who knows what a transmittal and an as-constructed drawing are, and watch Lunr run against a set of your own.
10M+ documents under management · Hosted in Australia and the US · SAML · Full audit trail · Export anytime
- entity
- Lunr Labs Pty Ltd
- location
- Melbourne AU
- workspace
- documents.lunr.app
- rev
- 2026